Looking at the settings that Birdwatching Scene Mode sets up on my camera, I wanted to view the difference in the settings as I zoom out. The only thing I have against the Nikon P610 is that the lens is variable in that I can set it all I like at 3.3, but when I zoom out it changes according to what focal length I end up with. That doesn't happen with the Panasonic FZ200 but hey, not camera is perfect. Anyway, when I zoomed right out, there weren't any birds outside the window at the time so I aimed at a hibiscus bud. Oh - the leaves behind it blurred out and gave me a good clean shot. Aperture down to 5.6 but still nice and clear.
Then
I aimed at a much smaller flower, a seaside daisy. The aperture went out to 6.5 and I found I really liked the result, with the large ginger lily leaf going right out of focus and leaving the seaside daisy and a few stems (I did crop this a bit because a lot of dead stalks were to one side).
Showing posts with label aperture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label aperture. Show all posts
Sunday, 10 January 2016
Thursday, 20 March 2014
Learning from experience
I have just been reading Rob Sheppard's blog about how important experience with your photography equipment is; I too find that, even though I read about how to get the best out of my camera, when I actually go out and start practicing what I have learnt in theory, that is the only way to integrate it into my understanding. I had been reading about reflections in water as well as composition of shots. This is a cormorant that I noticed when I had those things buzzing around in my head. It was quite some distance away and I had a shutter speed of 1/1000 and F/2.8 in Aperture Priority, and I moved around to try to get the best background. The background of grasses was the least distracting. Eventually I narrowed it down on my computer to this shot, which I cropped to get the effect. The reflection was almost complete - I found that was surprisingly difficult to capture, so many of the shots I took had fractured reflections, this was the closest. I had expected the water to be still and show the reflection perfectly but there were ducks swimming around nearby which obviously was disturbing the surface.
My own reflections: I think I should have changed the aperture - it was on 2.8 but being so far away, I should have tried for a greater depth of field. I will try to change my aperture more in the future - I have tended to stick to 2.8 rather too much, and thinking about it, the cormorant was further away than it's reflection - so although I had the auto focus on 23 area, the clearest part is actually the water.
The blog I referred to at the top is here:
http://www.natureandphotography.com/?p=1899
My own reflections: I think I should have changed the aperture - it was on 2.8 but being so far away, I should have tried for a greater depth of field. I will try to change my aperture more in the future - I have tended to stick to 2.8 rather too much, and thinking about it, the cormorant was further away than it's reflection - so although I had the auto focus on 23 area, the clearest part is actually the water.
| Cormorant, Lochiel Park wetland lake | ©Christine Linton |
http://www.natureandphotography.com/?p=1899
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)